Translate

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Variation IX Nimrod with 'Ein feste Burg'

"He was a mighty hunter before the Lord; that is why it is said, 'Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the Lord.'"
Variation IX is dedicated to August  JaegerElgar's friend and champion at the London music publishing firm Novello. Elgar's choice of nicknames for his German friend is remarkable because its connotations spell out the covert Principal Theme's title by means of one of Elgar's favorite diversions, wordplay. For those who failed to appreciate the hunter connection between Nimrod with Jaeger, Elgar cleverly encodes his friend's initials using the Roman numerals. I stands for one, and the first letter in the alphabet is A. X represents ten, and the tenth letter is J. Taken together, IX translates alphanumerically into AJ for August Jaeger. Remarkably the letters AJ are an anagram for JA, the German word for 'yes.' In contrast, the number nine is phonetic for 'nein,' the German word for 'no.' With the Roman numerals and the number they designate, Elgar cleverly hints at the German words for yes and no. Incredibly, the German word for no (nein) has within it the first word ein from the title of the covert Principal Theme. The marked emphasis on the German language is clearly an important clue, but one most Elgar scholars commonly overlook.
After identifying Ein feste Burg as the covert Principal Theme to the Enigma Variations, the next step was to assess whether it could convincingly play 'through and over' each of the movements. The first subjected to this acid test was the most solemn and revered in the collection, NimrodFigure 18.1 demonstrates how Ein feste Burg plays 'through and over' Variation IX, a requirement stipulated by Elgar in the original 1899 program note. An audio file of this melodic mapping supports the efficacy of this contrapuntal solution.

Within the Enigma Theme, Ein feste Burg remains in its original meter of common time with four quarter note beats per measure. In contrast, Nimrod uses three rather than four quarter note beats per measure. This obviously demands some flexibility with interpolating the notes of the covert Principal Theme over the movement. Just as Elgar more freely construed the theme in each of the variations, so too must the Principal Theme play more fluidly through and over the whole set. To accomplish these  melodic mappings, it is crucial to take into consideration each particularly movement’s meter, key, melodic and harmonic architecture.  Dr. Clive McClelland correctly argues in general for the application of free rhythm, but did so under the misguided assumption the missing Principal Theme should be subjected to such a treatment when paired with the Enigma ThemeOn the contrarythe meter and note values of Ein feste Burg remain virtually unchanged when wedded with the Enigma ThemeMcClelland had the right idea, but applied it to the wrong movement.
Figure 18.2 documents how Ein feste Burg was carefully mapped over Variation IX based on melodic interval mirroring and the principles of counterpointMelodic interval mirroring occurs when note intervals from Ein feste Burg are reflected in the variation over comparable or identical distances between notes. These notes do not necessarily appear in the melody line of the variation. The contrapuntal devices of similar and contrary motion were also considered in this analysis. Similar motion is when both voices move in the same direction, but not necessarily by the same degree. Contrary motion takes place when Ein feste Burg moves in the opposite direction than the variation, again not necessarily by the same interval. Similar motion is indicated by SM, and contrary motion by CM. For the purposes of this analysis, similar motion includes any instances of parallel motion, and contrary motion any cases of oblique motion. An effective counterpoint typically uses a fairly balanced mix of contrary and similar motion, a feature evident in this melodic mapping.


In Figure 18.2 a melodic conjunction is represented by a diamond shaped note head, and a harmonic conjunction by a triangle shaped note head. A melodic conjunction is defined as any matching melody note between Ein feste Burg and the movement's melody line. A harmonic conjunction is defined as match between a melody note from the covert Principal Theme and any non-melodic note from the movement. Both melodic and harmonic conjunctions must sound together to be considered a match.
Table 18.1 documents 27 shared melody notes between Ein feste Burg and Nimrod, an amount just over twice that found with the Enigma Theme (13). These melodic conjunctions are present from measures 334 to 373, a span of 40 measures.  Nimrod is 43 measures in length with 153 melody notes, 38 of which play when Ein feste Burg is dormant in measures 341, 349-350, 356, 361-364, 368-372. There are 79 notes in this version of Ein feste Burg, so 34% overlap with the melody line from Nimrod. Excluding dormant notes from Nimrod’s melody leaves 115 out of 153. This means 23% of Nimrod’s melody notes overlap with Ein feste Burg.


Table 18.2 breaks down melodic conjunctions between Ein feste Burg and Variation IX by note type. There are 7 types of shared melody notes with frequencies ranging from 2 to 9.


Table 18.3 identifies 150 shared notes between Ein feste Burg and Nimrod present in 36 of 43 measures, or about 84% of the movement. 27 are melodic conjunctions, and 123 are harmonic conjunctions. 68 of 79 melody notes from Ein feste Burg are embedded sequentially within Nimrod, amounting to just of 86% of the covert Theme. Ein feste Burg was found to be dormant over 37 quarter note beats dispersed over 13 bars (i.e., measures 341, 349-350, 356, 361-364, and 368-372). There are 9 types of shared notes with frequencies ranging from 2 to 61. Among these note conjunctions, 7 are shared by both melodies (i.e., A-flat, A, B-flat, C, D, E-flat, and G).


Conclusion
The preponderance of the evidence presented in the above Figures and Tables demonstrates Nimrod is a clear and convincing counterpoint to Ein feste BurgTo learn more about the secrets of the Enigma Variations, read my eBook Elgar’s Enigmas Exposed. Like my heavenly Father’s gift of salvation, the price is free.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry but I think Nimrod and Ein feste Burg sound horrendously dissonant together, and no amount of diagrammatics are going to convince me otherwise.

SirPadgett said...

While there are a few dissonances present, these result invariably from brief but necessary passing tones. What is undeniable is there are 150 melodic and chordal note matches between "Ein feste Burg" and "Nimrod". Such a high number of shared notes is compelling evidence "A Mighty Fortress" is in fact the unstated Principal Theme to Elgar's 'Enigma' Variations.

Anonymous said...

There can be 150 melodic and choral note matches between "Smoke gets in your eyes" and "Nimrod" but that in itself proves nothing.

The resultant voice-leading here is atrocious, e.g. the four consecutive parallel fifths at four bars before reh. 36. You can't wriggle out from under the multiple contrapuntal infractions here by invoking "passing tones." Elgar was no avant-gardiste and his counterpoint was always impeccable.

SirPadgett said...

Anonymous insists there can be 150 note matches between “Nimrod” and “Smoke gets in your eyes” without furnishing one iota of evidence in support of such an outlandish assertion. If Anonymous attempts such a mapping, that party would quickly discover it is much easier said than done. In any event, the absence of just such a mapping renders Anonymous’ torpid claim empty and meritless.

As for “contrapuntal infractions” in my mapping of “Ein feste Burg” over “Nimrod”, I turn to no higher authority than Elgar himself in my defense. In his first biography published in 1905 by Robert J. Buckley, Elgar is quoted as saying:

“You were talking of contrapuntal rules and restrictions. I have gone over them all: marked, learned, and inwardly digested everything available in theoretical instruction I could come across (and I think I have come across most of what has been written); and I cherish a profound respect for the old theorists. They were useful in their day, but they were not entitled to lay down hard and fast rules for all composers to the end of time.”

Concerning Elgar’s cavalier attitude towards contrapuntal rules, Elgar’s first biographer observed the following:

“I have not given any space to consideration of Elgar’s wanderings from the paths of contrapuntal rectitude, as laid down by the theory formalists. The Roman soldiers tied weights to their sandals when marching for exercise, that by discarding them in time of war they might rejoice in comparative lightness and freedom. So, it would seem, are musicians weighted in the study of strict counterpoint, that in free composition they may derive additional inspiration from the joy of casting the load aside. It may be suggested that Elgar has cast away not only the weights but also the sandals. The sequence of consecutive fifths in ‘The Apostles’ is calculated to make the old theorists uneasy in their graves. But this is only history repeating itself. The Man of Progress is necessarily the Breaker of Laws, and if the Law-breaker is justified by results, we can demand no more.”

Anonymous would have been wise to review Elgar’s first biography before commenting, particularly the section referencing his use of parallel fifths. Facts are stubborn things, and Anonymous would benefit from consulting them before commenting.

An excellent description of Anonymous’ contribution to this debate is aptly conveyed by the title “Smoke gets in your eyes.” Is it any wonder that bumbling personage posted anonymously?

About Mr. Padgett

My Photo

Mr. Padgett studied violin with Michael Rosenker, and Rosenker’s pupil, Owen Dunsford. Mr. Padgett studied piano with Sally Magee (a student of Emanuel Bay), and Blanca Uribe, a student of Rosina Lhévinne. He attended the Stevenson School in Pebble Beach, California, and Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, New York, where he graduated Phi Beta Kappa with a degree in psychology. At Vassar he studied music theory and composition with Richard Wilson. Mr. Padgett has performed for Joseph Silverstein, Van Cliburn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Maria ShriverSteve Jobs, Prince Charles, Lady Camilla, Marcia Davenport, William F. Buckley, Jr., and other prominent public figures. His original compositions have been performed by the Monterey Symphony, at the Bohemian Grove, the Bohemian Club, and other private and public venues. In 2008 Mr. Padgett won the Max Bragado-Darman Fanfare Competition with his entry "Fanfare for the Eagles". It was premiered by the Monterey Symphony under Maestro Bragado in May 2008. A member of the Elgar Society, Mr. Padgett is married with five children.